First, when asked where the "the town hall" should go ("quo vadis"), is to be noted that buildings do not move by itself. But it has fallen of the citizens, to start the big thing and put a lot of money in this the town hall. However, only the content was moved to the city coffers, not the building. The citizenship
I speak it from a number of reasons to be wise, which I cite here two.
It was alleged that fertigzustellende be ascribed to the technical town hall later reduced operating costs were distributed as for the accommodation of the administration, and that the savings primarily to the Condition of the old building should be attributed. But there is no reduction of this claim by verifiable figures. For this reason, the above statement is not much value. It is also surprising that this argument in the context of the discussion, ask the schools to be rehabilitated.
is further noted that 1.7 million euros have been set in the sand, that had not been built at the municipal engineering überhapt. This sum is to be written. If she now has to serve as an argument for the continuation, we can never admit to any mistakes and have to constantly throw good money after bad.
It seems to me necessary that the town hall-like decision Like other similar decisions will be revised, because otherwise we can not assert that the Government is cleaned of bad manners.
(rough translation @ Kay Karpinsky )
0 comments:
Post a Comment